Human Dignity
Vatican II published an important document
touching on modern times, Gaudium et
spes. There we read about the dignity of the human person. The human is
really central and even summit. This dignity of the human person is what serves
as foundation of social life. If we are to ask what is it that we must
constantly and vigilantly recognize as basis of all we do, is it human dignity.
Theologically, the dignity of the human person
is directly related to the mystery of the Word made flesh (see Gaudium et spes 22). The human is
created in the image and likeness of God and the Word—the Son—became flesh and
lived among us (see Jn.1/14). The Word incarnated and became human—Jesus was in solidarity with humanity. The
incarnation of Jesus was such a strong affirmation—and reaffirmation—of the
value and dignity of the human. Truly the human is so valuable, the image of
God is so valuable that God himself became human. Jesus in his incarnation and
solidarity with us fully honored our humanity. Jesus also opened the doors
telling us that we belong to the Father. Human as we are, we are meant to live
in communion with God.
Human dignity is inalienable. This word, “inalienable” means that our dignity cannot
be “alien” or “foreign” to us. By virtue of the fact that we are human; we
cannot remove dignity from us. Dignity is not an addition to us. It is not a separate
aspect of ourselves. We are of dignity. The
fact that we are image of God and the fact that the Word became human affirm
our dignity.
The sense of “being human” therefore is always
linked with relationship with God. God
is our source of “being” and God is the final end of our “being”. Now, there
are different ways of living. Within culture some of us are richer, some are
poorer. Some have more power, other have less power. Some are prestigious,
others are not. But we have been created as image of God so no matter what status
we have in society we remain image of God
and we remain those whom Jesus shared
life with. We can never say that a poor person has “less dignity” than the
rich person. We all and altogether share the same dignity. Human dignity goes beyond the cultural statuses and labels we
hold. Hence Gaudim et spes insists that because dignity is proper to everyone our dignity has rights that
should not be violated. (See Gaudium ert
spes 26).
The dignity of each of us is not based on success
or failure in social life. It is not dependent on capacities, abilities and
talents. Human dignity is based on a simple fact: God loves each of us.
This discussion on dignity clarifies the
different stand we need to make in front of moral-ethical issues like abortion
and euthanasia. We are also guided in our economic and political activities. We
cannot remove the fact that we are all
equal in dignity. Jesus has affirmed this well by being one of us. His
incarnation and solidarity with us affirm that each and every single human is honored equally. Each and every
single human person is “joined with” Christ; for we see how Christ became so
fully human he even experienced suffering and death like all of us. (See Gaudium
et spes 22). In Jesus Christ all humans stand in dignity.
Yes, the Word incanated—the Word became flesh. So flesh is, itself, an incarnation. We as human are incarnated. We are “in-flesh”. In our human condition as incarnate we are in link with everything around us. We taste our sweat; it is salty. We have the minerals in us. We grow and develop parts of our bodies; we are like the vegetation. We have sensations and feeling; we are like the other animals. Then of course we think and we reason out—and we use our thinking to relate with the world. We have language which identifies us socially. We are a kind of “summary” of the whole universe! How can we look down and belittle our being incarnate? Our different relationships with the world around us—with people, animals, things—are all possible thanks to our very own incarnation. Through our incarnation we enter into relationships with others.
Yes, the Word incanated—the Word became flesh. So flesh is, itself, an incarnation. We as human are incarnated. We are “in-flesh”. In our human condition as incarnate we are in link with everything around us. We taste our sweat; it is salty. We have the minerals in us. We grow and develop parts of our bodies; we are like the vegetation. We have sensations and feeling; we are like the other animals. Then of course we think and we reason out—and we use our thinking to relate with the world. We have language which identifies us socially. We are a kind of “summary” of the whole universe! How can we look down and belittle our being incarnate? Our different relationships with the world around us—with people, animals, things—are all possible thanks to our very own incarnation. Through our incarnation we enter into relationships with others.
What is so fantastic and wonderful is that the
Word became flesh so that we be more and more clear about the love of God for
us. In terms of ethics-morality, such as in the case of bioethics, sexual life
and medical ethics, we can be guided by this dignity of the human incarnate. We can be guided in our
discernment about what we shall do with the human body—as in transgender
change, alcoholism, drug addiction, torture, prostitution and even work
conditions. (See Gaudium et spes 27). We can also be guided in our discernment about our relationship with Nature—the
ecological problem which is so actual today. How do we see our incarnation in
front of Nature?
Now we believe in God as Trinitarian. The human is image of God—yes—who is Trinitarian. What
do we see in the Trinity? We see communion. We see love and sharing. So our
being image of the Trinitarian God leads us to recognize that we too are
community. We are fulfilled and truly human in communion with others. We make
full and real our being-human in
communion, in relationship, is being-with others. To live with others is
not an addition to our being-human. The human being is inter-relational. The
human being is "communitarian". (See Gaudium
et spes 25).
Social life, with all its different elements—economics,
politics, etc.—must therefore have full respect for the human dignity. We can
never say that some need to be in communion with others while others do not. To
be human and to live in dignity is to be social. Society and all the
institutions within society must give priority to human dignity. If we talk of
economic growth and development we need to consider human dignity. We need to
consider the community. We cannot just grow and develop economically at the
expense of the community. We cannot be exclusive in economic growth and
development. Each one must have a participation. Here we can think of the
ethics of work and capital.
Now, social life has become so complex and so complicated we experience so much inequality—and poverty and misery. If we are to take seriously the respect for human dignity we need to be vigilant about the conditions of the poor and the marginalized. This is why we have, in the Church, the “preferential option for the poor”. Social life has become so complex that, indeed, many are marginalized. So many may have started to question their own dignity. The preferential option for the poor is to affirm that the poor always have dignity that must be respected.
Reflecting on human dignity, I ask myself if we exercise this respect for dignity in our country. There is a big danger in serving exclusively those who belong to the same political color. If one is wearing another color, this person runs the risk of being set aside and not even listened to. Is this not a violation of respect for human dignity? Any citizen of the country of any political color has the basic right to be served properly and humanely.
Now, social life has become so complex and so complicated we experience so much inequality—and poverty and misery. If we are to take seriously the respect for human dignity we need to be vigilant about the conditions of the poor and the marginalized. This is why we have, in the Church, the “preferential option for the poor”. Social life has become so complex that, indeed, many are marginalized. So many may have started to question their own dignity. The preferential option for the poor is to affirm that the poor always have dignity that must be respected.
Reflecting on human dignity, I ask myself if we exercise this respect for dignity in our country. There is a big danger in serving exclusively those who belong to the same political color. If one is wearing another color, this person runs the risk of being set aside and not even listened to. Is this not a violation of respect for human dignity? Any citizen of the country of any political color has the basic right to be served properly and humanely.
No comments:
Post a Comment