Wednesday, December 3, 2014

Mga Tula ng isang Mapagkunwari ... Kunwari Makata

Hwag mangarap sa bayan ng mga bastos
Sila na ang maingay sila pa ang ma-angal
Sumingit na sa bakuran mo sila pa ang may riklamo.
Sabihan mo ng karapatan
Hahanapan ka ng paglalabagan
Magsumikap ka ng malinis
Sa buwis ka nanakawan.
Hwag mangarap sa bayan ng mga bastos.
       (30 Nob 2014)

Dito sa bayan ng mga bastos
May mga prinsipyo ring
Pinagmamalaki at
Pinangangahalagahan.
Heto, mga halimbawa,
"Wala akong kapwa".
"Di bale'ng walang dangal basta't makaraos".
"Maging katuwatuwa sa kasinungalingan".
"Ang pagnanakaw ay karapatan".
Iilan lang ito sa napakarami pang iba na
Pinagmamalaki at
Pinangangahalagahan.
Dito sa bayan ng mga bastos.
      (2 Dis. 2014)

The wind started a tune
Through the cracks of a wall
And I turned to listen
That perhaps your voice too
Would whisper that you're here.
The rain kept drumming strong
On the iron sheet above my head,
No rhythm there, just banging banging drunk and lost
A thousand snares  and slits and stir
As if to say, it's empty now, my home.
      (29 Dec. 2014)


The storm keeps pounding on the field
I see nothing but a grey shroud of rain.
In the night when the beast should asleep be
I stay awake and alert; the roof’s my only shield.
I keep memory of all that is of pain
As though it’s all that’s left of me.  
The wind is now blowing wild
In the distance the boughs creak and break.
So much time does anguish need
To find its comfort at my side.
Shall it leave me in peace for my sake
As though it were serious enough indeed?
My bones are tired from all my mess
My flesh has weakened from any lust.
No prayer is on my lips; it’s now painted on the wall.
Still the unfathomable storm unleashes
Within this helpless man going fast
Down the abyss he did not forestall.    
        (31 Dec.2014)

I find myself in a dark night.
Moonless.
Nothing to be seen.
There lurks the imagined shadow
Of him who will slit my throat
When he sees me asleep.
Bravo, moonless night,
You make each move without trace.
My veins alert
My shoulders upright
And my hand bladed.
Now resumes
What I thought was over.
    (31 Dec 2014)

While the birds chirp machines fly by;          
Noise of engines and of men working
Not seeing night nor day; they all grind
Aimlessly.       
While the clouds calmly hover bullets fling out;       
Tongues of useless words speak of names    
That mortal soldiers die for
Aimlessly.
Each does the same to consume and consume                  
For one’s indoor dwelling  
Seeping with boredom and anxiety
Aimlessly.

Meanwhile
A mother and her child
Under a leaking thatched roof
Still keep their blessing in their hearts
For their savior has ventured to become flesh
To show the face of the Father
And the folly of living
Aimlessly.
    (1 Jan. 2015)


Did you know that
Memory is cellular too?
When the mother left the child at the doorway
To run so far  so bloody far away
She placed the child’s skin, flesh, entrails
Brain, legs and arms
At the mercy of fear to be alone
And be dismembered from all possible trust.
Did the mother know that henceforth
Harm and pain and loneliness
Will be the growing child’s faithful friends?
Did she ever wonder why there’s no forever
For her child whose every joy is never meant hello?
Did she ever know that every verse from her child’s lips
Will never be truly uttered without shame?
And when the mother decided to come home dying
Did she not know that the doorway’s gone
And her child’s stretched shadow shall have been cast
In a gloomy alley she’ll never visit?  
Yes, memory is cellular
As it is carried by every fiber of a disappearing man.
     (1 Jan 2015)


Sa bayan ng mga bastos
Ang salita ay masalimuot
Upang ang dukha’y di makaunawa
At nang sila’y tumugon nang tumugon
Sa mga hangarin ng nakakaunawa.
At bakit di nga naman?
Eh may mga mamamayan
Na di naman daw angkop
Sa hugis ng kayamanan
Kapangyarihan
Karangalan?
Ang mga dukha,
Masyadong marami na daw sila
Dapat bawasan
Upang maginhawaan naman
Ang mga maiiwan.

    (3 Enero 2015) 


Nagtanong si Manong
“Ano ba ang bastos
At lagi mong panggatong
Sa sigaw mong namamaos?”
“Manong”, ang aking sagot,
“Bastos ang walang galang sa dangal
Ang katuparan sa karapatan ay nilagot
At ang tutok ay sa sariling angal”.
“Ah”, wika ng matanda,
“Tumawid akong lumpo
At ni isa ang pumara,
Nasagi na, ako pa ang ginago”.
Tuloy ang kanyang paglalakad
Papauwi sa tahanang lurayluray
Kamay sa baywang nakaladkad
Ng nagmamanehong nagtago sa laway.
    (5 Enero 2015)

Sa bayan ng mga bastos
Pinipili kung sino’ng tao
Nangingibabaw ang sama’ng loob.
Pamumulitika’y walang paltos
Sari-sari’t panig wari’y sa totoo
At ang sa kabilang panig ay itinataob.
Sa bayan ng mga bastos
May akala mo’y kung sino
Malayo naman sa dukkha’t laging nakasaklob.
Sa sigaw nila’y namamaos
Sa bulong nama’y nagtatago
Inaaming tao rin sila’t may loob.
     (9 Marso 2015)





Tuesday, December 2, 2014

“The poor you will always have with you” (Mk.14/7) So do we tolerate poverty?


Sometimes it is hard to talk about poverty and social injustice—especially when we are do not experience the hardships. So instead of facing the issue, one might be tempted to say, taking from the Bible, “You will always have the poor with you”. So by saying this one might think that the issue is closed. There will always be the poor so it is better to accept this and move on. Now, did Jesus really say this? Yes, he did. What could he have meant by it?
The statement of Jesus is in a context that does not necessarily involve the poor—not directly. It is said in a story with a woman to whom the Good News is announced. In the account of Matthew the story happens a little bit before the last supper and the arrest of Jesus. A woman comes to Jesus and pours perfume on him. The perfume, we know, is very expensive. The gesture of the woman is a gesture honouring Jesus and it imitates the preparation of the dead before putting it in the tomb. So the woman foresees the cross of Jesus.
The disciples have a different view. They criticize the gesture—they do not like the devotion. It is a waste of money—the perfume is so expensive. Jesus answers them—in a rather dry way. Why get disturbed with what the woman just did. What she had done was beautiful. Jesus sees the gesture of the woman as beautiful.
The woman discerns the sacrifice of Jesus. She makes her own gesture—she participates by her sacrifice to the Lord. It is at this point when Jesus says, “You always have the poor with you…but you will not always have me”. There is a reference to Dt 15. It seems that only Jesus and the woman know the full sense of not having Jesus.
Just think about some people who are so “engaged” with the poor that their involvement affect their family lives and even their health. This is not in conformity with the Gospel. It is not exactly what Jesus had in mind. Our devotion is towards Jesus and not the poor themselves. Yes, we must love our neighbour—especially our poor neighbour—but we are devoted to Jesus.
The woman understands this…but not the disciples. The spiritual life must be guided properly to be able to manage well the service towards the poor.
Note the verse in Deuteronomy that Jesus cites. “There will be no poor with you” (Dt.15/4). Why? Because the Lord God will fill you will good things. The Lord God “will bless you abundantly in the land, he will give you to possess as a heritage”. In this situation nobody will be poor and needy. In the land to be given by the Lord, there will be enough for all. There will even be surplus that will allow trade and commerce with other nations (see Dt.15/6).
God never wants a world of lack. God never put the human in a world that cannot meet human basic needs. God had created a world of abundance for the human. But, again with Deuteronomy, there is a requirement involved: “listen to the voice of the LORD, your God, and carefully observe this entire commandment” (Dt.15/5). Abundance depends on fidelity to God.
Yet it does happen that there are the poor and people in need. So, Deuteronomy adds, “…you shall not harden your heart nor close your hand against your kin who is in need. Instead, you shall freely open your hand and generously lend what suffices to meet that need” (Dt.15/7-8). Strange, is it not, that even if God gives abundance there are still the poor.
Why are there the poor in Israel, so much so that God requires an open hand and support for the needy? In the promised land there is still injustice and people are not so faithful to the commands of the Lord. Israel has failed to comply to the Lord. (And is this not true also today?)
Let us return to Jesus. What might he mean when he says that the poor will always be with us? Jesus speaks of adoration. Jesus speaks of the poor in answer to the critique against the devotion of the woman. Jesus mentions Deuteronomy to remind the disciples that there are the poor because of the negligence of society—injustice is still the “favourite sport”. Self-centeredness is still the favourite “pass time”. The disciples do not care for the poor nor for the woman. Jesus reproaches his disciples. Deuteronomy gives a command. There are the poor and the needy…therefore “open your hand freely to your poor and to your needy kin in your land” (Dt 15/11). The land is a land of abundance given by the Lord God. There is enough for all. The human creature—in the likeness of the Lord God—is so gifted with creativity and the capacity for production and service to all. But the darkness of the human heart contradicts the created order of God.
When Jesus says that the poor will always be with us, he is triggering shame. The fact that there are poor is a cause of shame. We are reminded of the true cause of poverty: human darkness, human selfishness. No, Jesus is not justifying the presence of the poor.
Jesus is not giving a pretext about the poor. Jesus reminds the disciples—and us—that the poor are with us because we do not keep the commandments of God.
Our relationship with the Lord God has degenerated. It has degenerated up to the point of injustice to others and to nature itself.

Jesus is not teaching us toleration about poverty. He is not saying that there is nothing we can do about poverty since the poor is always present anyway. No. In fact, we should share…and when we share “…give generously and not with a stingy heart” (Dt 15/10). Share and the result will be “…that the LORD, your God, will bless you in all your works and undertakings”. 

A Reflection on Media and Politics

 “Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers”. This is Article 19 of the Declaration of Human Rights (1948).
A government tends to be totalitarian when the media are controlled by the political powers. Having dominion over information is basic to sitting in power. Media are necessary for a democratic society. 
Media are plenty in form. There are the newspapers, the television stations, the radio, and today the so-called “social media”. It would be quite “nice” if behind these media is diversity of information we can have access to.
Today even the “surveys” have become media too. They too have become means of communication and information. Surveys often serve the politicians. They are “cooked” or "skewed" to orient opinion in favor of certain political lines.
Access to information is basic to a democracy; no democratic system is without this access. But we can ask if this is completely observed in our country. Are the media not in partnership with those in political and economic powers? If this happens—this “partnership”—then the democracy ceases to be “for the people”. Is it not true that many of the media we find in our country today “owe” a lot to politicians (and public money)? A newspaper firm or a television firm have the capacity to use their power of disseminating information in favor of certain political lines. Let us not forget also that politicians “owe” a lot to media. Somehow media present politicians in a certain light favorable to those politicians. “Opposing media” are easily “tamed” by the dominant media. Media people have utang na loob to politicians and politicians have utang na loob to media people.
How do media serve politicians? One way is by making sure that “readers” or “listeners” do not reflect. Put them at a distance from what concerns them. Is it not true that politicians try to impress upon people the idea that people need not get involved with what concerns them. Let the politicians take care of people’s worries. So media will present information without substance. The television screen is filled with data of global magnitudes far from the actual local conditions. Opinions are filled with noise on very impertinent topics. Fear of everyone is promoted on situations that do not happen to everyone.
Ok, there are topics that are presented as well studied and well researched. But they are designed to agree to a system that is already in operation and handled by the present politicians. Media create among the people an illusion that is announced as necessary. Live according to a necessary illusion. This will justify the political powers presently sitting. Then put a big chunk of space and time for the spectacular—like pages on the lives of actors-actresses.
Most of media, helas, have given up their work to elaborate a space for discussion and reflection. Media have become, to a large extent, instruments of political propaganda.
Ok, it is also true that there are the critical minds who do not just swallow what media feed them. They are not the passive consumers of pages and screen shows. But, really we ask, how many are they? How many are those who think critically and stop and reflect…and discuss? Social media may be an index of how many they are. But even their posts are surrounded by propaganda and spectacles. Their views and opinions are flooded with images that, again, dethrone the concern for truth. Very often when we are so entertained we lose track of serious truth…and we might even approve of telling a lie so long as we are entertained. To have access to information is a human right. Information is part of the “common good”—that is, the conditions that allow us to “bloom”. To communicate is a right.
Still, we can be thankful for “social media”--like the facebook--because of their wider scope of freedom. Politicians are disturbed by social media; they find it difficult to control social media. Hence, without surprise, some politicians want to pass laws censoring social media. How effective are social media in our country--and by effective I mean "enough to mobilize people" to do changes and not just to rant in facebook posts?